Gee guys, thanks for the comments! I didn’t even have to prompt you guys or anything! My favorite (use this as an example from now on):
“The calvinism shirt was funny but philosophically untenable. “This shirt chose me,” implies that the shirt has the ability to choose. It should read, “This shirt was chosen for me.”"
Notice that the author begins with praise - “The calvinism shirt was funny”. If you’re at a loss for words just start with telling me how good whatever idea or concept I expressed was. The author then proceeds to point out a fault in the idea or concept but also provides a suitable substitute. Now let’s see how NOT to post a comment.
A few months ago a reader wrote:
“You’re an Idiot”
Notice how this does not fit the formula stated above. The author of this post actually suffers from severe mental deficiencies so I let it slide but it is not an example of proper posting protocol. How could the author have improved this comment? By starting out with a note of praise.
For instance - “Paul, you are such an awesome guy but I do not agree with your line of logic on this particular issue. Maybe one day I’ll understand - until then you’re still the best!”
Notice how this comment is more grounded in reality. Also the addition of MORE praise at the end of the comment is always encouraged, but not necessary.
Try some on your own now keeping in mind the examples provided.